ISLAMABAD – In the days leading up to Pakistan’s crucial matches in the Asia Cup, PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi’s presence has drawn widespread criticism, with many questioning whether his involvement is adding undue pressure on the team.
During the night before Pakistan’s second encounter with India, Naqvi visited the national team’s practice session, an act that many observers say disrupted the team’s focus. Witnesses report that his arrival caused a halt in practice, with players and staff attempting to curry favor, while Pakistan ultimately suffered a heavy defeat against India.
Similar scenes unfolded in Colombo, where Naqvi was present at the team hotel the night before a high-stakes match. Reports indicate that he was the center of attention, with players and journalists alike paying homage to him. Critics argue that such distractions, especially so close to significant matches, undermine the team’s mental preparation.
Pakistan’s coach, Mike Hesson, was compelled to defend Naqvi’s presence during a press conference, but insiders suggest that his interference was inappropriate at such a tense juncture. Sources also reveal that Naqvi left the stadium during the match at the fall of the sixth wicket—a move that has not gone unnoticed.
Journalists close to the team describe Naqvi’s departure as a blow to team morale, with some questioning his priorities. “Roast him. He left at the fall of the 6th wicket,” one journalist remarked, highlighting the perceived lack of support during critical moments.
Many believe Naqvi’s desire for limelight is hurting Pakistan cricket more than helping. Critics argue that he needs to step back and allow the players to focus without external distractions. In the current climate, Pakistan’s cricket struggles across all formats—men’s, women’s, and youth levels—are evident, with a 6-0 record against India under Naqvi’s tenure.
Analysts warn that unless there is a change in leadership approach, Pakistan’s cricketing prospects may continue to decline. With the team’s morale and focus questioned, some suggest that Naqvi should consider stepping down, especially if Pakistan reaches the final against India—a scenario considered unlikely but not impossible.
In sum, critics say that Naqvi’s heavy-handed approach and desire for attention are exacerbating the unrest within Pakistan cricket. As the pressure mounts, many believe that a leadership change might be necessary to halt the decline and restore focus on the game itself.
