Since the onset of the ongoing conflict with Iran, reports have circulated suggesting that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu played a role in influencing former President Donald Trump to initiate military action against Tehran. However, recent remarks from both leaders indicate a lack of consensus on the future of the war.
While President Trump expressed optimism about ending U.S. military involvement in Iran within two to three weeks, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu emphasized Israel’s commitment to continue its military campaign, stating that the country would persist in “crushing Iran’s terror regime.”
These contrasting statements followed Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, who stated Iran has the “necessary will” to end the war if its enemies assured it would not reignite.
Trump Signals Possible US Withdrawal
In a statement at the White House, President Trump indicated that U.S. military operations against Iran could conclude soon, suggesting an exit within two to three weeks. He clarified that reaching a deal with Iran was not a prerequisite for ending the military actions.
“We’ll be leaving very soon,” Trump said, adding, “maybe two weeks, maybe three.” When asked if diplomacy was necessary, he responded, “No, they don’t have to make a deal with me.”
Trump’s stance marks a shift from previous days, during which he hinted at the possibility of escalating military efforts, including deploying ground forces, unless Iran accepted a 15-point ceasefire framework demanding nuclear restrictions and the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
However, on Tuesday, Trump suggested that maintaining open waterways should be the responsibility of the nations reliant on them, stating, “There’s no reason for us to do this.”
Diplomatic Frustrations and International Tensions
The president’s comments come amid frustration with European allies, whom he urged earlier in the day to “go get your own oil,” highlighting the strained international cooperation over the conflict.
As the situation develops, the conflicting positions of the US and Israel underscore the complex and uncertain future of the Iran crisis, with potential implications for regional stability and global economics.
